This week UPA completed 9th
year in the office and general election is less than a year. Therefore, this is
a good time to have a look at the economic performances of the current UPA
government at the centre and compare against the previous NDA government. This comparison
is required because various opinion polls conducted across the country showed that
NDA is ahead of the UPA and it gives an opportunity for the people to make an
opinion of their own based on the comparative data. The present article discusses
the GDP growth, consumer price index inflation, fiscal deficit, current account
deficit and external debt. These parameters broadly define the economic
condition of any country. Data used in this article are from planning
commission website for the financial year from 2000 to 2012. Data from Financial
year 2000 to 2004 are considered for NDA regime and same from financial year 2005
to 2012 are considered for UPA regime.
The comparison of GDP growth and
Consumer Price Index (CPI) Inflation between NDA and UPA government is
presented in Figure 1.
During the NDA period average GDP growth was 5.9%, while same during UPA period
was 8.3%. The growth comparison between
NDA and UPA clearly shows that the GDP growth during UPA period is 2.4% higher
than the NDA period. However, the
comparison of consumer price index inflation between NDA and UPA regime gives
an interesting result. The average CPI inflation during NDA period was 3.9%,
while same during UPA period was 7.7%. This
shows that NDA government did good job in controlling the inflation, which
resulted higher wealth creation than UPA government since the difference
between the GDP growth and the CPI inflation for NDA government is 2 % as
against the same for UPA government is 0.6%.
A comparative study of fiscal and
current account deficit and external debt was also carried out between NDA and
UPA governments, which are presented in Figure 2.
The average fiscal deficit during NDA regime was -5.3 % of the GDP, while the
same for UPA regime was -4.6 % of the GDP. However, the average current account
deficit during UPA government was -2.0 % of the GDP, while the same during NDA government
was 0.5 % of the GDP. From this comparison it is clear that UPA government
maintained lower fiscal deficit than the NDA government. In case of current account
deficit, NDA government maintained surplus cash for short term expenses unlike
UPA government. The average debt to
GDP ratio during NDA government was 22.9%, which is lower than the same during
UPA government with 29.8%.
Overall, NDA regime resulted in creating more wealth by maintaining lower
inflation, surplus cash for short term cash expenses and low external debt. On
the contrary, UPA regime resulted in lower wealth creation due to high
inflation, more borrowings for short term expenses and high external debt.
No doubt that NDA is much better, and only Modi can Save India and take to better future.
ReplyDeleteVery well written Pradeep ji. I'm sharing this on https://www.facebook.com/hindutva
ReplyDelete