Mr. Sanjay
Jha’s writing on moral ambivalence coming from a person who belongs to a party
which doesn’t have morality at all. He starts the article with narratives on
Mrs. India Gandhi. But conveniently forgets that same Gandhi imposed emergency
in the country and put thousands of people behind bar. He conveniently forgets
to talk about Mrs. Gandhi’s decision to hold election in Assam after horrific
the killings of innocent Muslims in Nielle under centre’s watch in spite of the
opposition from the election commission. Again he forgets to add in that Mrs.
Gandhi famously told while campaigning in north eastern state that state will
be run as per Bible. Look at Mr. Jha’s moral ambivalence here, he proudly
states that allegation on Mrs. Gandhi regarding misuse of the official
machinery was cleared by SC, but at the same breath he wants to pronounce Mr.
Modi guilty in spite of not a single court in the country found him guilty even
after 11 long years of investigation. I want to ask Mr. Jha, did Mrs. Gandhi resign
based on moral ground or Allahabad HC’s judgement? If it was based on the court
judgement, which court pronounced Mr. Modi guilty of any wrong doing? Does
country has separate legal system for Mr. Modi, where he is presumed to be
guilty until proven guilty in a court of law? What kind moral ambivalence Mr.
Jha is talking about?
I am really
baffled by the argument that since riot took place under Mr. Modi’s watch; he
is not eligible to talk about the good governance. If I extend the same argument
even Congress CMs like Tarun Gogoi, Ghelot and Pratviraj Chavan are not
eligible to talk about the Good Governance. However, BJP ruled states have not
seen a single riot after 2002, which is contrary to the Congress ruled states. If
I take pre 2002, horrific killings of minorities took place under Congress’s
watch whether it is 1984 anti-Sikh riot, 1989 Bhagalpur riot, 1983 & 2012
Assam riots etc. This list is endless and these riots show that the Congress pathetically
failed protect the citizens especially minorities. Unlike other riots, 2002
Gujarat riot has been investigated thoroughly by SC appointed SIT, which gave
clean chit to Mr. Modi. By rejecting it and questioning the integrity of the
SIT, Mr. Jha displaying his disrespect to institution and his way is the highway.
In addition Congress even failed take any action against their leaders involved
in the any of the riots and continuously disrupting the legal process.
Now coming
to Rambo act, BJP spokesperson has rightly said it is rather good to be a Rambo
than to be a Dumbo and Scambo. If 15000 was not the right number of pilgrims rescued
by the Gujarat government, why didn’t Mr. Jha present the right number in his
article? The fact is even UK state didn’t know how many pilgrims were there,
how many died, how many are missing and how many are buried? Funny thing is Congress
party’s ‘YUVA RAJ’ went to UK in spite of HM’s
suggestion of not to allow VIP’s visit. Look how bad omen this ‘YUVA RAJ’ is,
the day he visited, IAF aircraft crashed, which resulted in loss of life. Also,
ITBP had to evacuate their jawans from their guest house to provide security
the ‘YUVA RAJ’. Is this the kind of morality and ethics Mr. Jha is talking
about?
Mr. Jha’s
observation on Mr. Modi’s idea on ‘less government and more governance’ is
totally misunderstood. I would advise him to listen to the speech given by Mr.
Modi in the ‘Think India’ discussion conducted by TV18. Mr. Modi clearly
mentioned that he didn’t mean ‘Less Government’ as reducing the size of the government,
instead having right size of government at right place/department. Mr. Modi
explained this with an example as well. But people like Mr. Jha don’t get these
ideas because of their intellectual bankruptcy.
Now coming to
malnutrition, farmer suicides, poverty ratios, woeful education levels, and
other social and human development indicators. Mr. Jha is presenting as if only
Gujarat has these problem. In most of these parameters Gujarat performed better
than the Centre governed Congress. I am presenting comparison of some of these
parameters which were taken from the Planning Commission website. I don’t have
to comment anything on these since the data speaks for itself. I expected at least
a data based analysis than mere rhetoric from Mr. Jha. I will do more comparison
studies based on some more parameters in the coming days.
Sate
|
Avg_GDP_Growth
(%, FY02-12)
|
Per
Capita Income as on FY12 (Rs)
|
Unemployment
Rate (per 1000 persons)
|
Literacy
Rate Growth (%, btwn 2001 to 2011)
|
Safe
Drinking Water (%)
|
Malnutrition
(%)
|
Gujarat
|
10.10
|
57508.00
|
10
|
10
|
90.3
|
38.77
|
India
|
7.71
|
38037.00
|
38
|
9
|
85.5
|
41.16
|
Mr. Jha
talks about Mr. Modi making frequent visits to FICCI/CII. Why does PM attend annual
CII meeting every year? Who is stopping ‘YUVA RAJ’ from making frequent sojourn
to FICCI/CII and project himself as messiah of middle class? When he was
invited to give speech in CII, he made mess of it without giving any hope to
industries and telling them that if industries have any problem don’t ask for
PM’s help. If this is the kind of leaders projected by Congress, definitely any
sensible person wouldn’t be excited/happy. The reality is even after the
country is headed by an economist PM MMS, growth is going down, foreign
exchange reserves is going down, inflation is high, rupee is depreciating,
current account deficit is high, fiscal deficit is high, unemployment is
growing, PMO is not aware of the decisions taken by his ministers etc. On the
contrary in the past decade Gujarat’s growth is above the national average, agriculture
growth is nearly 10%, 72% of the country’s employment was created by Gujarat
etc. If Congress leaders lost the opportunity and Mr. Modi provides the hope
for good future, Mr. Jha should be blaming his party itself not Mr. Modi. One
more point I wish make here is that most of the corporates have businesses in
Maharastra, which is ruled by Congress for past 14 years. What was stopping Congress
CMs to get the confidence of these corporates? Is Mr. Jha saying that people of
the country are fools to be hoodwinked easily by a leader who shows close
proximity to the corporates?
The fact is
Congress fooled people of the country through vote bank politics. Mrs. India
Gandhi came up with slogan ‘Garib Hatao’, she couldn’t achieve anything but
entitlement based schemes. This divided the country based on caste and
religious line. According the Planning Commission date 29.8% of the population
is below poverty line which includes Hindus, Muslims, Christians, Buddhists,
Jains, Sikhs, Parsis. India can’t be a developed country until every citizen is
brought above the poverty line. Why couldn’t Congress come with a holistic approach
based on income for the poverty elevation instead of caste and religion based schemes?
Can Mr. Jha through some light on this?
No comments:
Post a Comment